4.7 Article

Control of nickel availability by nickel bearing minerals in natural and anthropogenic soils

Journal

GEODERMA
Volume 136, Issue 1-2, Pages 28-37

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.01.008

Keywords

nickel; soil; speciation; weathering; availability; soil contamination

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this paper was i) to determine the Ni-bearing minerals and localize Ni in natural and contaminated Ni-rich soils, ii) to characterize Ni availability with isotopic exchange kinetics (IEK) and iii) to study its interactions with soil mineralogy and characteristics along a gradient of weathering intensity. We sampled 16 soils varying from a recently exposed surface serpentinite in cold regions, to Ferralsols (laterites) from a humid tropical climate including two highly contaminated soils (Ni industry). The minerals identified ranged from primary minerals to secondary phyllosilicates and lastly to Mn/Fe oxides, according to weathering intensity. Primary minerals inherited from the parent materials and secondary phyllosilicates formed in low leaching conditions had concentrations of Ni similar to the rock (0.2-0.3%). When compared to other secondary minerals, Fe oxides displayed slight Ni enrichment in moderate leaching conditions (0.4-0.8%) up to 10-fold enrichment in highly weathered Ferralsols (4-6%). Full characterization of the three factors of Ni availability in soils: the intensity (C-Ni), the quantity (E-t) and the capacity (CF) factors was achieved with IEK. For most of the soils, C-Ni and E-t varied conjointly: elevated values of these two parameters were found in soils dominated by both phyllosilicates and amorphous Fe oxides (high exchange capacity); low values were found in soils with significant amounts of well-crystallized Fe oxides (high retention capacity). In the case of anthropogenic origin, control of soil Ni availability also depends on the type of Ni-bearing minerals. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available