4.5 Article

Zonisamide in the treatment of binge eating disorder with obesity: A randomized controlled trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 67, Issue 12, Pages 1897-1906

Publisher

PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS
DOI: 10.4088/JCP.v67n1209

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Binge eating disorder (BED) is associated with obesity. Zonisamide is a novel antiepileptic drug associated with weight loss. The purpose of this study was to evaluate zonisamide in the treatment of BED associated with obesity. Method: In this 16-week, single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose (100-600 mg/day) trial, 60 outpatients with DSM-IV-TR BED received zonisamide (N = 30) or placebo (N = 30). The primary outcome measure was weekly frequency of binge eating episodes. The primary analysis of efficacy was a longitudinal analysis of the intent-to-treat sample, with treatment-by-time interaction as the effect measure. Patients were enrolled from September 5, 2003, through October 1, 2004. Results: Compared with placebo, zonisamide was associated with a significantly greater rate of reduction in binge eating episode frequency (p = .021), body weight (p < .001), BMI (p = .001), and scores on the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale (p < .001), Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Binge Eating (p < .001), and Three Factor Eating Questionnaire disinhibition scales (p < .001). Plasma ghrelin concentrations increased with zonisamide but decreased with placebo (p = .001). The mean (SD) zonisamide daily dose at endpoint evaluation was 436 (159) mg/day. Twelve patients (N = 8 receiving zonisamide, N = 4 receiving placebo) discontinued because of adverse events. The most common reasons for discontinuing zonisamide were accidental injury with bone fracture (N = 2), psychological complaints (N = 2), and cognitive complaints (N = 2). Conclusion: Zonisamide was efficacious, but not well tolerated, in the short-term treatment of BED associated with obesity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available