4.6 Article

Empirical models for dark matter halos. I. Nonparametric construction of density profiles and comparison with parametric models

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages 2685-2700

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1086/508988

Keywords

dark matter; galaxies : halos; methods : n-body simulations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We use techniques from nonparametric function estimation theory to extract the density profiles, and their derivatives, from a set of N-body dark matter halos. We consider halos generated from Lambda CDM simulations of gravitational clustering, as well as isolated spherical collapses. The logarithmic density slopes theta equivalent to dlog rho/d log r of the Lambda CDM halos are found to vary as power laws in radius, reaching values of gamma approximate to -1 at the innermost resolved radii, similar to 10(-2)r(vir). This behavior is significantly different from that of broken-power-law models like the Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profile but similar to that of models like de Vaucouleurs's. Accordingly, we compare the N-body density profiles with various parametric models to find which provide the best fit. We consider an NFW-like model with arbitrary inner slope; Dehnen & McLaughlin's anisotropic model; Einasto's model (identical in functional form to Sersic's model but fitted to the space density); and the density model of Prugniel & Simien that was designed to match the deprojected form of Sersic's R-1/n law. Overall, the best-fitting model to the Lambda CDM halos is Einasto's, although the Prugniel-Simien and Dehnen-McLaughlin models also perform well. With regard to the spherical-collapse halos, both the Prugniel-Simien and Einasto models describe the density profiles well, with an rms scatter some 4 times smaller than that obtained with either the NFW-like model or the three-parameter Dehnen-McLaughlin model. Finally, we confirm recent claims of a systematic variation in profile shape with halo mass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available