4.5 Article

Effect of a short-acting NO donor on bubble formation from a saturation dive in pigs

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 101, Issue 6, Pages 1541-1545

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01191.2005

Keywords

diving

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Effect of a short-acting NO donor on bubble formation from a saturation dive in pigs. J Appl PhYsiol 101: 1541-1545, 2006. First published July 20. 2006; doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01191.2005.-It has previously been reported that a nitric oxide (NO) donor reduces bubble formation from an air dive and that blocking NO production increases bubble formation. The present study was initiated to see whether a short-acting NO donor (glycerol trinitrate, 5 mg/ml; Nycomed Pharma) given immediately before start of decompression would affect the amount of vascular bubbles during and after decompression from a saturation dive in pigs. A total of 14 pigs (Sus scrofa domestica of the strain Norsk landsvin) were randomly divided into an experimental (n = 7) and a control group (n = 7). The pigs were anesthetized with ketamine and alpha-chloralose and compressed in a hyperbaric chamber to 500 kPa (40 m of seawater) in 2 min, and they had 3-h bottom time while breathing nitrox (35 kPa 0,). The pigs were all decompressed to the surface (100 kPa) at a rate of 200 kPa/h. During decompression, the inspired Po-2 of the breathing gas was kept at 100 kPa. Thirty minutes before decompression, the experimental group received a short-acting NO donor intravenously, while the control group were given equal amounts of saline. The average number of bubbles seen during the observation period decreased from 0.2 to 0.02 bubbles/cm(2) (p < 0.0001) in the experimental group compared with the controls. The present Study gives further support to the role of NO in preventing vascular bubble formation after decompression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available