4.4 Article

Relationship between prostaglandin E2 receptors and clinicopathologic features in human prostate cancer tissue

Journal

UROLOGY
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages 1360-1365

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.035

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. Prostaglandin E-2 is involved in the carcinogenic process and malignant aggressiveness. These effects are mediated through binding to four specific type E prostanoid (EP) receptors (EP1R to EP4R). Although EPRs are overexpressed in a variety of cancers, their expression pattern varies among different cancer types. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical significance of EPRs in prostate cancer. Methods. We examined the expression of each EPR in 122 prostate cancer tissue samples by immunohistochemistry. We also investigated the relationship between EPRs and cancer cell proliferation. Results. The rate of immunopositivity for EP1R in cancer cells (36.3% +/- 14.3%) was significantly greater (P < 0.01) than in nontumor glands (7.1% +/- 4.8%) and correlated positively with the Gleason score (P < 0.01), T stage (P < 0.01), N stage (P = 0.03), M stage (P < 0.01), and cancer cell proliferation (r = 0.35, P < 0.01). The EP2R expression in cancer cells (38.9% +/- 11.6%) was significantly greater (P < 0.01) than in nontumor glands (30.6% +/- 8.6%), and correlated with cancer cell proliferation (P < 0.01). The EP4R expression in cancer cells was also significantly greater (P < 0.01) than in nontumor glands. However, the expression of EP2R and EP4R did not correlate with the clinicopathologic features and EP3R expression was not associated with any parameters. Conclusions. Our results have indicated that EP1R, EP2R, and EP4R are associated with prostate carcinogenesis. In particular, the EP1R seems to play an important role in malignant aggressiveness and tumor development in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available