4.6 Article

Enhancement of growth and gymnodimine production by the marine dinoflagellate, Karenia selliformis

Journal

HARMFUL ALGAE
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 658-664

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2006.02.001

Keywords

Karenia selliformis; gymnodimine; production

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Because of its novel bioactive properties the production of gymnodimine for use as a pharmaceutical precursor has aroused interest. The dinoflagellate, Karenia selliformis produces gymnodimine when grown in bulk culture using GP + selenium medium but the growth rates (mu) and levels of gymnodimine are low (mu, 0.05 days(-1); gymnodimine 250 mu g L-1 max). We describe the effects of organic acid additions (acetate, glycolate, alanine and glutamate additions and combinations of these) in enhancing growth and gymnodimine production in axenic cultures. The most effective organic acid combinations in decreasing order were: glycolate/alanine > acetate > glycolate. Glycolate/alanine optimised gymnodimine production by prolonging growth (maximum cell yield, 1.76 x 10(5) cells mL(-1); gymnodimine, 1260 mu g L-1; growth rate (mu), 0.2 days(-1)) compared to the control (growth maximum cell yield, 7.8 x 10(4) cells mL(-1); gymnodimine, 780 mu g L-1; mu, 0.17 days(-1)). Acetate enhanced gymnodimine by stimulating growth rate (mu, 0.23 days(-1)) and the large concentration of gynmodimine per cell (16 pg cell(-1) cf. 9.8 pg cell(-1) for the control) suggests a role for this compound in gymnodimine biosynthesis. Amending culture media with Mn2+ additions resulted in slightly decreased growth in control cultures and increased the gymnodimine while in glycolate/alanine cultures growth was stimulated but gymnodimine production decreased. The results suggest that the organic acid can enhance gymnodimine production by either enhancing growth maximum or the biosynthetic pathway. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available