4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Urinary proteomic profiles distinguish between active and inactive lupus nephritis

Journal

RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 12, Pages 1497-1504

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel351

Keywords

lupus nephritis; biomarkers; SELDI-TOF MS

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. Key aims of the treatment of lupus nephritis (LN) are to induce and maintain remission with minimal side effects. However, assessing ongoing renal inflammatory activity is poorly served by current diagnostic tests apart from renal biopsy, but frequent biopsies cannot be justified. Our long-term aim is to identify novel biomarkers from urinary protein profiles to improve diagnosis and monitoring of activity and response to therapy in LN. Methods. We used surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS) to identify biomarkers able to discriminate between urine samples from patients with inactive (n= 49) and active (n= 26) LN. Discriminant function analysis was used to define the minimum number of proteins whose levels best distinguished between the two patient groups. Serial urines of six biopsied patients were studied prospectively, and multiple regression (MR) scores calculated. Results. Proteins with masses of 3340 and 3980 distinguished active from inactive LN with 92% sensitivity and specificity of 92% each. The prospective study of the biopsied patients demonstrated that MR scores could predict both relapse and remission earlier than traditional clinical markers. Conclusions. SELDI-TOF MS identified potential biomarker profiles strongly associated with activity in LN. Identification of these proteins will allow us to devise specific assays to routinely monitor disease progression, and alter immunosuppressive drug regimens accordingly. These proteins may also play a critical role in the pathogenesis of glomerulonephritis, and could therefore provide targets for therapeutic intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available