4.4 Review

Safety and effectiveness of prophylactic gastrostomy tubes for head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemoradiation

Journal

SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 199-203

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2006.12.002

Keywords

chemoradiation; head and neck cancer; dysphagia; tube feedings

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We would like to assess the safety and effectiveness of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube feedings during concurrent chemoradiation for head and neck cancer. Methods: Patients who underwent chemotherapy and radiation for head and neck malignancies were evaluated for their abitity to resume oral. feeding following treatment. All patients underwent PEG tube placement prior to the treatment because of the expected mucositis. Gastrostomy tubes were removed following treatment when the patients were able to resume oral feedings without aspiration. Results: Between March 1999 and 2006, 104 patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer underwent concurrent chemotherapy and radiation. One patient dectined placement of gastrostomy tube. Ninety patients (86%) developed grade 3-4 mucositis during chemoradiation. Five patients died during treatment from aspiration pneumonia and sepsis. One hundred two patients lost weight during treatment. The mean and median weight loss during concurrent therapy was, respectively, 8.5 and 8kg (1-23.5kg). Following treatment, tube feedings were continued 1-41 months (mean: 8 months; median: 5 months) because of continued weight toss, chronic dysphagia, or aspiration. At a median follow-up of 19 months (1-62 months), no patient developed serious complications from tube feedings. Conclusion: Dysphagia resulting from the severe mucositis produced severe weight loss, despite tube feedings. Gastrostomy tube feedings are safe. Gastrostomy tubes should be placed prophylactically for patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available