4.7 Article

The effect of altitude descent on obstructive sleep apnea

Journal

CHEST
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages 1744-1750

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1378/chest.130.6.1744

Keywords

altitude; evaluation; obstructive sleep apnea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The present requirement for at facility polysomnograms requires many residents in mountain communities to descend in elevation for sleep testing, which may cause misleading results regarding the severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Design: Eleven patients with previously undiagnosed sleep apnea living at an altitude > 2,400 m (7,900 feet) in Colorado underwent diagnostic sleep studies at their home elevation and at 1,370 in (4,500 feet), and 5 of the 11 patients were also studied at sea level. Results: The mean (SE) apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) fell from 49.1 (10.5)/h to 37.0 (11.2)/h on descent to 1,370 in (p = 0.022). In the five patients who traveled to sea level, the AHI dropped from 53.8 (13.2)/h at home elevation to 47.1 (14.8)/h at 1,370 in, and to 33.1 (12.6)/h at sea level (p = 0.018). The reduction in AHI was predominantly a reduction in hypopneas and central apneas, with little change in the frequency of obstructive apneas. Duration of the obstructive apneas lengthened with descent. Of eight patients with an AHI < 50/h at their home elevation, two patients had their ARI fall to < 5/h at 1,370 in, and a third patient dropped to < 5/h at sea level, ie, below many physicians' threshold for providing therapy. Patients with the most severe OSA had the least improvement with descent. Conclusions: Because AHI decreases significantly with descent in altitude, polysomnography is most accurately clone at the home elevation of the patient. Descent to a sleep laboratory at a lower elevation may yield false-negative results in patients with mild or moderate sleep apnea.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available