4.2 Article

Effects of selective PGE2 receptor antagonists in esophageal adenocarcinoma cells derived from Barrett's esophagus

Journal

PROSTAGLANDINS & OTHER LIPID MEDIATORS
Volume 81, Issue 3-4, Pages 150-161

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2006.09.002

Keywords

Barrett's esophagus; adenocarcinoma; COX-2; prostaglandin E-2; EP receptors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accumulating evidence suggests that COX-2-derived prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)) plays an important role in esophageal adenocarcinogenesis. Recently, PGE(2) receptors (EP) have been shown to be involved in colon cancer development. Since it is not known which receptors regulate PGE(2) signals in esophageal adenocarcinoma, we investigated the role of EP receptors using a human Barrett's-derived esophageal adenocarcinoma cell line (OE33). OE33 cells expressed COX-1, COX-2, EPI, EP, and EP4 but not EP3 receptors as determined by real time RT-PCR and Westem-blot. Treatment with 5-aza-dC restored expression, suggesting that hypermethylation is involved in EP3 downregulation. Endogenous PGE(2) production was mainly due to COX-2, since this was significantly suppressed with COX-2 inhibitors (NS-398 and SC-58125), but not COX-1 inhibitors (SC-560). Cell proliferation (3 H-thymidine uptake) was significantly inhibited by NS-398 and SC-58125, the EP1 antagonist SC-51322, AH6809 (EPI/EP, antagonist), and the EP4 antagonist AH23848B, but was not affected by exogenous PGE(2) However, treatment with the selective EP2 agonist Butaprost or 16,16-dimethyIPGE, significantly inhibited butyrate-induced apoptosis and stimulated OE33 cell migration. The effect of exogenous PGE(2) on migration was attenuated when cells were first treated with EP(1)and EP4 antagonists. These findings suggest a potential role for EP selective antagonists in the treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available