4.4 Article

Effect of thyroxine replacement on serum IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and the acid-labile subunit in patients with hypothyroidism and hypopituitarism

Journal

CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages 706-711

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02652.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To describe the effect of T4 replacement in patients with primary and central hypothyroidism on components of the IGF binding protein complex: IGF-I, the acid-labile subunit (ALS) and IGFBP-3. Patients and methods We determined IGF-I, ALS and IGFBP-3 (by I-125-IGF-II ligand blots and immunoblots) in serum of 19 patients with primary and 11 patients with central hypothyroidism. Results Mean (+/- SD) free T4 (fT4) increased from 4.4 +/- 2.4 pmol/l at baseline to 18.6 +/- 5.2 pmol/l following T4 therapy. In patients with primary hypothyroidism, IGF-I concentrations increased from 101 +/- 57 to 158 +/- 60 mu g/l (P < 0.001) and ALS from 12.6 +/- 4.7 to 15.6 +/- 5.2 mg/l (P = 0.001). IGFBP-3 levels (in arbitrary units, AU), assessed by I-125-IGF-II ligand blot and by Western blot (the intensity of the 45/42-kDa doublet following T4 replacement defined as 1 AU) increased from 0.74 +/- 0.47 to 1 (P = 0.029) and from 0.76 +/- 0.42 to 1 (P = 0.018), respectively. In patients with hypopituitarism, IGF-I and ALS concentrations increased on T4 therapy from 49 +/- 23 to 97 +/- 36 mu g/l (P < 0.001) and from 7.8 +/- 4.1 to 11.0 +/- 2.7 mg/l (P = 0.010), respectively. IGFBP-3 remained unchanged during T4 replacement. Conclusions T4 replacement increases the serum levels of IGF-I and ALS in patients with primary as well as central hypothyroidism. IGFBP-3 levels increase in response to T4 replacement in patients with primary hypothyroidism but not in those with central hypothyroidism, suggesting that thyroid hormones increase IGF-I and ALS but not IGFBP-3 in patients with GH deficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available