4.4 Article

Does citrate prevent nephrocalcinosis in preterm neonates?

Journal

PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages 1830-1836

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-006-0274-4

Keywords

nephrocalcinosis; premature infants; citrate therapy; urinary citrate; ultrasonography; calcium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nephrocalcinosis (NC) occurs frequently in preterm neonates. A high U-calcium/citrate is one of the contributing factors to the development of NC. In stone-forming children and adults citrate supplementation is a successful preventive therapy. In this randomized controlled trial the effect of citrate therapy was studied on the development of NC in preterm neonates with a gestational age < 32 weeks. Thirty-eight preterm neonates (mean gestational age 29.8 weeks (SD 1.6), mean birth weight 1,300 g (SD 351) were treated with sodium citrate (0.52 mmol/kg/day in four doses) from day 8 of life until at term and 36 preterm neonates (mean gestational age 29.6 weeks (SD 1.6), mean birth weight 1,282 g (SD 256) were not treated. U-calcium, U-creatinine, U-citrate and U-pH were measured at day 7, 14, 21, 28 of life and at term. Renal ultrasonography (US) was performed at term. U-citrate/creatinine and U-pH were significantly higher and U-calcium/citrate was significantly lower in the citrate group at day 14, 21 and 28 compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Complications of citrate administration were not encountered, however the incidence of NC was not significantly different in the treated (34%) compared with the control group (44%), P=0.37. Preterm neonates treated with citrate in the first months of life have higher U-citrate/creatinine and lower U-calcium/citrate compared with controls. Sodium citrate therapy in a dosage of 0.52 mmol/kg/day is safe but does not prevent NC. Whether a higher dose or potassium citrate decreases the incidence of NC should be evaluated in further studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available