4.5 Article

Methods to control ectomycorrhizal colonization: effectiveness of chemical and physical barriers

Journal

MYCORRHIZA
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 51-65

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00572-006-0083-4

Keywords

ectomycorrhizal colonization; common mycorrhizal networks; hyphal restriction; fungicides; mesh barriers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We conducted greenhouse experiments using Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca) seedlings where chemical methods (fungicides) were used to prevent ectomycorrhizal colonization of single seedlings or physical methods (mesh barriers) were used to prevent formation of mycorrhizal connections between neighboring seedlings. These methods were chosen for their ease of application in the field. We applied the fungicides, Topas((R)) (nonspecific) and Senator((R)) (ascomycete specific), separately and in combination at different concentrations and application frequencies to seedlings grown in unsterilized forest soils. Additionally, we assessed the ability of hyphae to penetrate mesh barriers of various pore sizes (0.2, 1, 20, and 500 mu m) to form mycorrhizas on roots of neighboring seedlings. Ectomycorrhizal colonization was reduced by approximately 55% with the application of Topas((R)) at 0.5 g l(-1). Meshes with pore sizes of 0.2 and 1 mu m were effective in preventing the formation of mycorrhizas via hyphal growth across the mesh barriers. Hence, meshes in this range of pore sizes could also be used to prevent the formation of common mycorrhizal networks in the field. Depending on the ecological question of interest, Topas((R)) or the employment of mesh with pore sizes < 1 mu m are suitable for restricting mycorrhization in the field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available