4.5 Article

Profile of histone lysine methylation across transcribed mammalian chromatin

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 24, Pages 9185-9195

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01529-06

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK054937, DK54937, R37 DK058044, DK58044, R01 DK058044] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM008216, T32 GM08216-19] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Complex patterns of histone lysine methylation encode distinct functions within chromatin. We previously reported that trimethylation of lysine 9 of histone H3 (H3K9) occurs at both silent heterochromatin and at the transcribed regions of active mammalian genes, suggesting that the extent of histone lysine methylation involved in mammalian gene activation is not completely defined. To identify additional sites of histone methylation that respond to mammalian gene activity, we describe here a comparative assessment of all six known positions of histone lysine methylation and relate them to gene transcription. Using several model loci, we observed high trimethylation of H3K4, H3K9, H3K36, and H3K79 in the transcribed region, consistent with previous findings. We identify H4K20 monomethylation, a modification previously linked with repression, as a mark of transcription elongation in mammalian cells. In contrast, H3K27 monomethylation, a modification enriched at pericentromeric heterochromatin, was observed broadly distributed throughout all euchromatic sites analyzed, with selective depletion in the vicinity of the transcription start sites at active genes. Together, these results underscore that similar to other described methyl-lysine modifications, H4K20 and H3K27 monomethylation are versatile and dynamic with respect to gene activity, suggesting the existence of novel site-specific methyltransferases and demethylases coupled to the transcription cycle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available