4.7 Article

A log NHI=22.6 damped Lyα absorber in a dark gamma-ray burst:: The environment of GRB 050401

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 652, Issue 2, Pages 1011-1019

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/508049

Keywords

dust, extinction; galaxies : high-redshift; galaxies : ISM; gamma rays : bursts; quasars : absorption lines; X-rays : general

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/D000955/1, PP/D000920/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. STFC [PP/E002064/1, PP/C50633X/2, PP/D000955/1, PP/D000920/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The optical afterglow spectrum of GRB 050401 (at z = 2.8992 +/- 0.0004) shows the presence of a damped Ly alpha absorber (DLA), with log N-Hi 22.6 +/- 0.3. This is the highest column density ever observed in a DLA and is about 5 times larger than the strongest DLA detected so far in any QSO spectrum. From the optical spectrum, we also find a very large Zn column density, implying an abundance of [Zn/H] = -1.0 +/- 0.4. These large columns are supported by the early X-ray spectrum from Swift XRT, which shows a column density (in excess of Galactic) of log N-H = 22.21(-0.08)(+0.06) assuming solar abundances (at z = 2.9). The comparison of this X-ray column density, which is dominated by absorption due to alpha-chain elements, and the H I column density derived from the Ly alpha absorption line allows us to derive a metallicity for the absorbing matter of [alpha/H] = -0.4 +/- 0.3. The optical spectrum is reddened and can be well reproduced with a power law with SMC extinction, where A(V) = 0.62 +/- 0.06. But the total optical extinction can also be constrained independent of the shape of the extinction curve: from the optical to X-ray spectral energy distribution, we find 0.5 less than or similar to A(V) less than or similar to 4.5. However, even this upper limit, independent of the shape of the extinction curve, is still well below the dust column that is inferred from the X-ray column density, i.e., A(V) = 9.1(-1.5)(+1.4). This discrepancy might be explained by a small dust content with high metallicity (low dust-to-metals ratio). Gray extinction cannot explain the discrepancy, since we are comparing the metallicity to a measurement of the total extinction (without reference to the reddening). Little dust with high metallicity may be produced by sublimation of dust grains or may naturally exist in systems younger than a few hundred megayears.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available