4.7 Article

Bioavailability of salvianolic acid B in conscious and freely moving rats

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 326, Issue 1-2, Pages 25-31

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.07.003

Keywords

automated blood sampling; bioavailability; pharmacokinetics; salvianolic acid B; tandem mass spectrometry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Salvianolic acid B is an herbal ingredient isolated from Salvia miltiorrhiza. The aim of this study was to apply an automated blood sampling system coupled to a simple liquid chromatographic system to determine the bioavailability of salvianolic acid B in stress-free rats. The plasma sample (25 mu l) was vortex-mixed with 50 mu l of internal standard solution (chloramphenicol 10 mu g/ml in acetonitrile) to achieve protein precipitation. Salvianolic acid B in the rat plasma was separated using a reversed-phase C18 column (250 mm x 4.6 mm, 5 mu m) with a mobile phase of acetonitrile-methanol-20 mM NaH2PO4 (adjusted to pH 3.5 with H3PO4) (20:10:70 v/v/v) containing 0.1 mM 1-octanesulfonic acid, and the flow-rate of 1 ml/min. The UV detection wavelength was 286 nm. The concentration-response relationship from the present method indicated linearity over a concentration range of 0.5-200 mu g/ml. Intra- and inter-assay precision and accuracy of salvianolic acid B fell well within the predefined limits of acceptability (< 15%). The plasma sample of salvianolic acid B was further identified by LC-MS/MS in the negative ion mode using mass transition m/z 358.2 to the product ion m/z 196.9. After salvianolic acid B (100mg/kg, i.v.; 500mg/kg, p.o.) was given in conscious and freely moving rats, the AUC were 5030 +/- 565 and 582 +/- 222 min mu g/ml for intravenous (100 mg/kg) and oral (500 mg/kg) doses, respectively. The oral bioavailability of salvianolic acid B in freely moving rats was calculated to be 2.3%. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available