4.7 Article

Ameliorative effects of biological treatments on growth of squash plants under salt stress

Journal

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages 1-6

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.08.003

Keywords

squash; biological treatments; salt stress

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of selected biologicals on direct seeded and transplanted squash plant growth and mineral content under salinity stress. The study was conducted in pot experiments using a mixture of sandy loam soil: vermiculite (1: 1, v:v) under controlled greenhouse conditions. Biologicals tested included AgBlend, SoilBuilder, Yield Shield, PlantShield, Inoculaid and Equity. Salinity treatments were established by adding 0, 50 and 100 mM of NaCl to a base complete nutrient solution (Hydro-Sol +Ca(NO3)(2)). Pots were irrigated with NaCl solutions and biological treatments were included in the water. Yield Shield was applied as a seed treatment. Salinity negatively affected growth of squash; however, biological treatments significantly increased fresh weight compared to non-treated plants that were challenged with salt stress. Furthermore, biological treatments tested increased the uptake of potassium compared to the non-treated control in both direct seeded and transplanted squash. Sodium concentration was not affected by biologicals in directed seeded squash except for SoilBuilder, Yield Shield and Equity at 100 mM, while AgBlend, SoilBuilder, Inoculaid and Equity decreased sodium uptake in transplants under salt stress. The most effective biologicals increased the K+/Na+ ratio, which was positively correlated with plant growth. Alteration of mineral uptake may be one mechanism for the alleviation of salt stress. Based on the results of the experiment reported herein, the use of biological treatments may provide a means of facilitating plant growth under salt stress. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available