4.7 Article

Course of depressive symptoms and medication adherence after acute coronary syndromes -: An electronic medication monitoring study

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 11, Pages 2218-2222

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.063

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [K23 HL004458, HC-25197, N01 HC025197, HL-076857, R24 HL076857, HL-04458] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES We tested whether improvements in depressive symptoms precede improved adherence to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). BACKGROUND Depression is associated with medication nonadherence in patients with ACS, but it is unclear whether changes in depression impact on adherence. METHODS Electronic medication monitoring was used to measure adherence to aspirin during a 3-month period in a consecutive cohort of 172 patients (25 to 85 years) recruited within 1 week of hospitalization for ACS. Depressive symptom severity was assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) during hospitalization and at 1 and 3 months after hospitalization. Adherence was defined as the percentage of days aspirin was taken as prescribed. RESULTS Depression severity in hospital was associated with nonadherence in a gradient fashion: 15% of non-depressed patients (BDI score 0 to 4), 29% of mildly depressed patients (BDI score 10 to 16), and 37% of patients with moderately-to-severely depressive symptoms (BDI score > 16) took aspirin less than 80% of the time (p = 0.03). A cross-lagged path analytic model revealed that improvements in depressive symptoms in the first month after the ACS were associated with improvements in adherence rates in the subsequent 2 months (standardized direct effect -0.32, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS Diagnosis and treatment of depressive symptoms may improve medication adherence in patients after ACS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available