Journal
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 11, Pages 2235-2242Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.09.030
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA047988-13, R01 CA047988, CA-47988] Funding Source: Medline
- NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL080467-01, R01 HL080467-03, R01 HL080467, R01 HL043851-10, T32 HL007575, R01 HL043851-09, R01 HL043851, T32 HL007575-23, R01 HL080467-02] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
OBJECTIVES We sought to determine the relative strength of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and lipid levels as markers for future ischemic stroke compared with coronary heart disease (CHD) in women. BACKGROUND Although hs-CRP and lipid levels are established risk determinants for vascular disease, the relative strength of these biomarkers for ischemic stroke compared with CHD is uncertain. METHODS Among 15,632 initially healthy women who were followed for a 10-year period, we compared hs-CRP, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC), apolipoproteins A-I and B100, and lipid ratios as determinants of ischemic stroke compared with CHD. RESULTS After adjustment for age, smoking status, blood pressure, diabetes, and obesity, the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the third versus the first tertile for future ischemic stroke compared with CHD were, respectively, 1.91 (95% CI 1.13 to 3.21) and 2.26 (95% CI 1.64 to 3.12) for TC, 1.29 (95% CI 0.83 to 2.02) and 2.09 (95% CI 1.53 to 2.85) for LDL-C, 0.57 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.92) and 0.38 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.52) for HDL-C, 1.72 (95% CI 1.03 to 2.86) and 2.93 (95% CI 2.04 to 4.21) for non-HDL-C, and 2.76 (95% CI 1.51 to 5.05) and 1.66 (95% CI 1.17 to 2.34) for hs-CRP. Of the lipid ratios, that of TC to HDL-C had the largest HR for both future ischemic stroke and CHD (HR 1.95 [95% CI 1.16 to 3.26] and 4.20 [95% CI 2.79 to 6.32], respectively). CONCLUSIONS In this large prospective cohort of initially healthy women, lipid levels are significant risk determinants for ischemic stroke, but with a magnitude of effect smaller than that observed for CHD. High-sensitiviy CRP associates more closely with ischemic stroke than with CHD. Concomitant evaluation of lipid levels and hs-CRP may improve risk assessment for stroke as well as CHD.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available