4.7 Article

A kinematically selected, metal-poor stellar halo in the outskirts of M31

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 653, Issue 1, Pages 255-266

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/508599

Keywords

galaxies : evolution; galaxies : individual (Andromeda); galaxies : spiral; Local Group

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/D000920/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. STFC [PP/D000920/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present evidence for a metal-poor, [Fe/H] similar to -1.4, sigma = 0.2 dex, stellar halo component detectable at radii from 10 to 70 kpc, in our nearest giant spiral neighbor, the Andromeda galaxy. This metal-poor sample underlies the recently discovered extended rotating component and has no detected rnetallicity gradient. This discovery uses a large sample of 9861 radial velocities of red giant branch (RGB) stars obtained with the Keck II Telescope and DEIMOS spectrograph, with 827 stars with robust radial velocity measurements isolated kinematically to lie in the halo component primarily by windowing out the extended rotating component, which dominates the photometric profile of Andromeda out to < 50 kpc (deprojected). The stars lie in 54 spectroscopic fields spread over an 8 deg(2) region, and are expected to fairly sample the halo to a radius of similar to 70 kpc. The halo sample shows no significant evidence for rotation. Fitting a simple model in which the velocity dispersion of the component decreases with radius, we find a central velocity dispersion of 152 km s(-1) decreasing by -0.90 km s(-1) kpc(-1). By fitting a cosmologically motivated NFW halo model to the halo stars we constrain the virial mass of M31 to be greater than 9.0 x 10(11) M circle dot with 99% confidence. The properties of this halo component are very similar to that found in our Milky Way, revealing that these roughly equal mass galaxies may have led similar accretion and evolutionary paths in the early universe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available