4.8 Article

GABA and Gi/o differentially control circadian rhythms and synchrony in clock neurons

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0607466103

Keywords

luciferase; multielectrode array; Period gene; suprachiasmatic nucleus; vasoactive intestinal polypeptide

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [F31 MH073302, R01 MH063104, MH 63104, MH 073302] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS 30888, R01 NS030888] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neurons in the mammalian suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) generate daily rhythms in physiology and behavior, but it is unclear how they maintain and synchronize these rhythms in vivo. We hypothesized that parallel signaling pathways in the SCN are required to synchronize rhythms in these neurons for coherent output. We recorded firing and clock-gene expression patterns while blocking candidate signaling pathways for at least 8 days. GABA(A) and GABA(B) antagonism increased circadian peak firing rates and rhythm precision of cultured SCN neurons, but G(i/o). did not impair synchrony or rhythmicity. In contrast, inhibiting G(i/o) with pertussis toxin abolished rhythms in most neurons and desynchronized the population, phenocopying the loss of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP). Daily VIP receptor agonist treatment restored synchrony and rhythmicity to VIP-/- SCN cultures during continuous GABA receptor antagonism but not during Gi/o blockade. Pertussis toxin did not affect circadian cycling of the liver, suggesting that G(i/o) plays a specialized role in maintaining SCN rhythmicity. We conclude that endogenous GABA controls the amplitude of SCN neuronal rhythms by reducing daytime firing, whereas G(i/o) signaling suppresses nighttime firing, and it is necessary for synchrony among SCN neurons. We propose that Gi/o, not GABA activity, converges with VIP signaling to maintain and coordinate rhythms among SCN neurons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available