4.6 Article

Electrocaloric and pyroelectric properties of 0.75Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-0.25PbTiO3 single crystals

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 100, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.2407271

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pyroelectric and electrocaloric characterization has been determined for 0.75Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O-3-0.25PbTiO(3) relaxor based single crystal and ceramic. Differential scanning calorimetry was used for measuring the electrocaloric response for different electric fields in the vicinity of the Curie temperature. For both ceramic and crystals the maximum activity is found to be around the transition temperature. On the other hand hysteresis loops for different temperatures were used to predict the electrocaloric effect with very good qualitative agreements with direct measurements. Pyroelectric coefficient is found to be much larger for < 111 > single crystals reaching 1300x10(-6) C m(-2) K-1 whereas the ceramic reaches only 750x10(-6) C m(-2) K-1. Higher pyroelectric coefficient and lower dielectric permittivity lead to outstanding figures of merits for sensors and energy harvesting, with a gain of 260% for voltage responsivity and more than 500% for energy harvesting. Although having a much larger pyroelectric activity, the electrocaloric effect is about the same for crystals and ceramics-around 0.40 J/g for 2.5 kV/mm electric field step. This result is interpreted by the decrease of the pyroelectric coefficient for high electric field. The electrocaloric activity is in fact limited by the saturation polarization and difference between Curie transition temperature and the working temperature. Those two parameters are very similar for crystals and ceramics. Single crystals are consequently very interesting materials in the framework of energy harvesting and sensor applications whereas no real improvement of performances can be expected for electrocaloric refrigeration devices. (c) 2006 American Institute of Physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available