4.7 Article

Anthropic pedogenesis of purple rock fragments in Sichuan Basin, China

Journal

CATENA
Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages 51-58

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2006.04.022

Keywords

pedogensis; rock fragment; complexing of organo-mineral; mineral nutrient; purple soil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Considerable amounts of rock fragments are found in many Purple soils developed from purple rocks in the Sichuan basin of southwestem China. We describe the effects of anthropic pedogenetic processes on purple rock fragments associated with soil amelioration by determining changes in rock fragment size distribution, transformation of P and K of purple rocks into soils, and the complexing of purple rock particles (soil mineral particles) with organic matter during anthropic pedogenesis of Purple soils in Sichuan basin of southwestem China. The pedogenetic capacity of rock fragments can be expressed by the content of < 2.0 mm particles as weathered products of rock fragment disintegration. The pedogenetic capacity of the purple rocks studied ranges from 0.3% to 6.2% under natural conditions. The rates of P and K transformed from purple rocks are closely associated with the pedogenetic capacity of rock fragments(r = 0.891**; 0.961**, n = 16). Digging (simulated by sieving) and crop planting facilitate pedogenesis of purple rock fragments and their mineral nutrient transformations. The soil mineral particles preserve 18% - 36% of the organic carbon added as corn straw. The organic carbon is complexed after corn straw is mixed with < 1.0 mm soil mineral particles for 1 year. The improvement of newly reclaimed purple soils is enhanced by the complexing effect of organic substances with purple rock particles. The pedogenesis of purple rock in Sichaun basin can be accelerated by anthropic activity, such as tillage, crop planting, fertilization, and land reclamation. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available