4.7 Article

ACS photometry of extended, luminous globular clusters in the outskirts of M31

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 653, Issue 2, Pages L105-L108

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/510670

Keywords

galaxies : individual (M31); galaxies : star clusters; globular clusters : general

Funding

  1. STFC [PP/D000920/1, PP/C50352X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/C50352X/1, PP/D000920/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new population of extended, luminous globular clusters has recently been discovered in the outskirts of M31. These objects have luminosities typical of classical globular clusters, but much larger half-light radii. We report the first results from deep ACS imaging of four such clusters, one of which is a newly discovered example lying at a projected distance of similar to 60 kpc from M31. Our F606W, F814W color-magnitude diagrams extend similar to 3 mag below the horizontal branch level, and clearly demonstrate, for the first time, that all four clusters are composed of greater than or similar to 10 Gyr old, metal-poor stellar populations. No evidence for multiple populations is observed. From a comparison with Galactic globular cluster fiducials we estimate metallicities in the range -2.2 less than or similar to [Fe/H] less than or similar to -1.8. The observed horizontal branch morphologies show a clear second parameter effect between the clusters. Preliminary radial luminosity profiles suggest integrated magnitudes in the range -7.7 less than or similar to M-v less than or similar to -6.6, near the median value of the globular cluster luminosity function. Our results confirm that these four objects are bona fide old, metal-poor globular clusters, albeit with combined structures and luminosities unlike those observed for any other globular clusters in the Local Group or beyond.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available