4.7 Article

Apple orchard frost protection with wind machine operation

Journal

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
Volume 141, Issue 2-4, Pages 71-81

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.08.019

Keywords

frost protection; Malus pumila mill.; frost fans; night cooling; freeze damage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research has shown that wind machines are more effective under conditions of strong thermal inversions. Quantitative relationships between the level of protection and inversion strength, however, are not well known, and there are few reports on the effect of fan operation on energy balance. Whether the wind machines should be started before surface cooling causes turbulence damping and atmospheric stratification or if it is possible to delay starting until just before the critical temperature occurs remains a matter of discussion. Therefore, experiments were conducted on 11 spring frost nights during the 1999 and 2000 to assess the effectiveness of a fan operation on frost protection of an apple orchard under different microclimatic conditions. The 11 frost events were characterized by light winds (0.58-1.92 m s(-1)) and clear skies for most of the night, resulting in an average accumulated radiative loss of 2.67 +/- 0.38 MJ m(-2). The air temperature increased immediately after the wind machines were started and the temperature rise depended on inversion strength. For each 1 degrees C increase in temperature inversion strength between 1.5 and 15 m height, wind machine operation caused a 0.3 degrees C increase of air temperature at a 1.5 m height within the main area affected by the fan operation. Using multiple regression, the area protected was significantly related to the temperature increase and the inversion strength. Wind machine operation reduced flower damage by 60% in 1999 and 37% in 2000. Distribution of flower damage varied spatially, and it was related to wind drift. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available