4.7 Article

Surface and structural effects in the hydrogenation of citral over RuCu/KL catalysts

Journal

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
Volume 97, Issue 1-3, Pages 122-131

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2006.07.016

Keywords

ruthenium copper catalysts; citral selective hydrogenation; KL zeolite; CO chemisorption; decoration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Four 2 wt% Ru/KL catalysts, doped with copper, were prepared by successive impregnation of a KL zeolite with Ru-3(CO)(12) and Cu(NO3)(2) - 3H(2)O aqueous solutions in an adequate concentration to obtain 0, 0.5, 1 and 1.5 wt% of copper. The samples Ru/KL, RuCu0.5/KL, RuCu1.0/KL and RuCu1.5/KL were characterized by X-ray diffraction, temperature-programmed reduction, chemisorption of CO and H,, BET surface area, infrared spectroscopy of adsorbed CO and microcalorimetry of CO adsorption. Catalytic activity measurements in the selective hydrogenation of citral, at 323 K and 5 MPa in the liquid phase, showed that copper inhibits the overall hydrogenation activity of Ru/KL catalysts, the higher the copper concentration the larger the activity reduction, without significant modification of the hydrogenation turnover frequencies. Selectivity toward unsaturated alcohols decreases as the copper content increases in favor of that of citronellal. The presence of bimetallic entities on the doped catalysts was suggested by the TPR measurements and the occurrence of hydrogen spillover phenomenon evidenced by the results of the chemisorption measurements of hydrogen and CO. The catalyst behavior is consistent with both, decoration/encapsulation of ruthenium by copper particles and occlusion of Ru inside the zeolite pores. This is suggested by the strong decrease of CO chernisorption capacity of the catalysts in the order Ru/KL > RuCu0.5/KL > RuCu1.0/KL > RuCu1.5/KL and strengthened by the CO-FTIR and microcalorimetry results. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available