4.4 Article

Reduction of centrifugation force in discontinuous percoll gradients increases in vitro fertilization rates without reducing bovine sperm recovery

Journal

ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE
Volume 146, Issue 3-4, Pages 103-110

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.02.016

Keywords

Sperm selection; Density-gradient centrifugation, Bovine, IVF

Funding

  1. CNPq [501763/2009-0]
  2. FAPERGS [1011575]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of different centrifugation forces in bovine sperm separation by discontinuous Percoll gradients for in vitro fertilization IVF. The semen samples from each bull were pooled or each bull were centrifuged separately and centrifuged in discontinuous Percoll gradients (30, 60 and 90%) at different forces: F1 (9000 xg), F2 (6500 xg), F3 (4500 xg) and F4 (2200 xg), according experiment. The sperm samples were evaluated to determine the concentration, motility, vigor, morphology, reactive oxygen species (ROS), integrity of the plasma membrane, lipid peroxidation, antioxidants and embryo development were also evaluated. No difference was observed in the concentration of sperm submitted to different centrifugation forces. The total percentage of motile sperm was increased after centrifugation at F3 and F4, and the ROS production at F1 was greater than the other forces. When the bulls semen were processed individually, no significant differences were observed for the sperm quality parameters between Fl and F4, including lipid peroxidation, antioxidants, cleavage rate and average time to the first cleavage. This work demonstrated for the first time that centrifugation at 2200 xg enhanced the sperm penetration and fertilization rates without reducing sperm recovery compared to the typical centrifugation force (9000 xg) currently used by the commercial bovine IVF industry. (c) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available