4.7 Article

Antioxidant activities of five different mulberry cultivars in Korea

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 955-962

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2006.06.007

Keywords

mulberry; Morus alba L.; anthocyanin; cyanidin-3-glucoside; cyanidin-3-rutinoside; antioxidant; radical scavenging activity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Five major mulberry [Pachungsipyung (M-1), Whazosipmunja (M-2), Suwonnosang (M-3), Jasan (M-4) and Mocksang (M-5)] cultivated in Korea were assessed for their polyphenolic composition using spectrophotometric methodology, and tested for antioxidant potential by some different assays. The total polyphenol (TP) was found from 2235 to 2570 mu g/g gallic acid equivalents, total anthocyanin (TA) content to vary from 1229 to 2057 mu g/g, coloured anthocyanins (CA) from 126 to 190 mu g/g, and total flavanol (TF) from 16.4 to 65.4 mu g/g catechin equivalents except Mocksang (M-5). The ethanolic extract from mulberry fruit shows a rapid and concentration-dependent increase of antioxidant activity. Especially, the antioxidant activities of M-2 and M-4 are higher than those of the others in a hemoglobin-induced linoleic acid system. The reducing power compared with BHT was observed to high value in M-2, M-3 and M-4 extracts. Effectiveness in reducing powers was in a descending order of M-4 > M-2 > M-3 > M-1 > M-1. The DPPH-scavenging ability of the ethanolic extract from mulberry fruit was 60.0% at 200 and 212 mu g of M-2 and M-4, respectively. M-2 and M-4 also showed sharply increase of hydroxyl scavenging ability with concentration of the extracts. IC50 values in scavenging abilities on hydroxyl radicals were 30 mg and in a descending order of M-5 > M-3 > M-1 > M-4 > M-2. Superoxide anion-sacavenging activities of M-2, M-3 and M-4 showed 17.1, 14.5 and 14.8 SOD unit/mg, respectively. (c) 2006 Swiss Society of Food Science and Technology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available