4.4 Article

Firing patterns of human genioglossus motor units during voluntary tongue movement

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages 933-936

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00737.2006

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [K23 DC007597, DC 07597] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS 39489] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Firing patterns of human genioglossus motor units during voluntary tongue movement. J Neurophysiol 97: 933 - 936, 2007. First published October 4, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn. 00737.2006. The tongue participates in a range of complex oromotor behaviors, including mastication, swallowing, respiration, and speech. Previous electromyographic studies of the human tongue have focused on respiratory-related tongue muscle activities and their role in maintaining upper airway patency. Remarkably, the activities of human hypoglossal motor units have not been studied during the execution of voluntary maneuvers. We recorded single motor unit activity using tungsten microelectrodes in the genioglossus muscle of 10 healthy human subjects performing both slow tongue protrusions and a static holding maneuver. Displacement of the tongue was detected by an isotonic transducer coupled to the lingual surface through a customized lever arm. For protrusion trials, the firing rate at recruitment was 13.1 +/- 3 Hz and increased steeply to an average of 24 +/- 6 Hz, often with very modest increases in tongue protrusion. For the static holding task, the average firing rate was 16.1 +/- 4 Hz, which is surprisingly high relative to limb motor units. The average coefficient of variation of interspike intervals was similar to 20% (range, 10-28%). These are the first recordings of their type obtained in human subjects and provide an initial glimpse into the voluntary control of hypoglossal motoneurons during tongue movements presumably instigated by activity in the motor cortex.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available