4.6 Article

Prion interference is due to a reduction in strain-specific PrPSc levels

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 81, Issue 2, Pages 689-697

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01751-06

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [C06 RR017417, P20 RR0115635-6, C06 RR17417-01, P20 RR16469, P20 RR016469] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS052609] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When two prion strains infect a single host, one strain can interfere with the ability of the other to cause disease but it is not known whether prion replication of the second strain is also diminished. To further investigate strain interference, we infected hamsters in the sciatic nerve with the long-incubation-period transmissible mink encephalopathy (TME) agent DY TME prior to superinfection of hamsters with the short-incubation-period HY TME agent. Increases in the interval between TME agent inoculations resulted in an extension of the incubation period of HY TME or a complete block of the ability of the HY TME agent to cause disease. The sciatic nerve route of inoculation gave the two TME strains access to the same population of neurons, allowing for the potential of prion interference in the lumbar spinal cord. The ability of the DY TME agent to extend the incubation period of HY TME corresponds with detection of DY TME PrPSc, the abnormal isoform of the prion protein, in the lumbar spinal cord. The increased incubation period of HY TME or the inability of the HY TME agent to cause disease in the coinfected animals corresponds with a reduction in the abundance of HY TME PrPSc in the lumbar spinal cord. When the two strains were not directed to the same populations of neurons within the lumbar spinal cord, interference between HY TME and DY TME did not occur. This suggests that DY TME agent replication interferes with HY TME agent replication when the two strains infect a common population of neurons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available