4.7 Article

Randomised trial of sequential versus concurrent chemo-radiotherapy in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (EORTC 08972-22973)

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 114-121

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.09.005

Keywords

NSCLC conformal radiotherapy; concurrent chemo-radiotherapy; sequential chemo-radiotherapy; oesophageal toxicity

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [5U10CA11488-27, 5U10CA11488-35] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methods: One hundred and fifty-eight patients were randomised to receive two courses of Gemcitabine (1250 mg/m(2) days 1, 8) and Cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) day 2) prior to, or daily low-dose Cisplatin (6 mg/m(2)) concurrent with radiotherapy, consisting of 24 fractions of 2.75 Gy in 32 days, with a total dose of 66 Gy. Results: Acute haematological toxicity grade 3/4 was more pronounced in the sequential (S) (30% versus 6%), oesophagitis grade 3/4 more frequent in the concurrent (C) arm (5% versus 14%). Late oesophagitis grade 3 was 4% (S and C), pneumonitis grade 3/4 14% (S) and 18% (C). Because of the poor power of the study no significant differences in median survival (MS), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) could be detected. MS was 16.2 (S) and 16.5 (C) months, 2-year OS was 34% (S) and 39% (C), 3-year OS was 22% (S) and 34% (C). Conclusion: Radiotherapy 66 Gy given concurrently with daily low-dose Cisplatin or after two courses of Gemcitabine/Cisplatin was well tolerated. Due to early closure no conclusions can be reached on the relative merits; both arms showed good OS. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available