4.5 Article

Early random capillary glucose level screening and multidisciplinary antenatal teamwork to improve outcome in gestational diabetes mellitus

Journal

ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages 283-290

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/00016340601110747

Keywords

gestational diabetes mellitus; maternal-fetal outcome; random blood glucose; oral glucose tolerance test

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. This study describes maternal and neonatal characteristics and delivery outcome in women with gestational diabetes mellitus [GDM], compared to a control group. Methods. Aretrospective observational study of 719 women with GDM was undertaken in a Swedish urban district. All other parturients at the same hospital served as the control group. GDM was diagnosed using random capillary glucose levels at fixed intervals, beginning early in pregnancy. An oral glucose tolerance test was performed at glucose levels >= 7.0 mmol/ l (127.8 mg/dl). Data was analysed according to glucose levels at diagnosis, ie, mild or severe GDM. Results. GDM was diagnosed in 2.28% of the women who were older and had higher Body Mass Index [BMI]. A high proportion was of non-Nordic origin (44.5%); they had severe GDM more often (49.1%) than the Nordic group (33.1%). The GDM-mild group had less complications and abnormalities, compared to the GDM-severe group, although both groups differed from the control group in this respect. Delivery was spontaneous in 70.2% of GDM-mild, 65.7% of GDM severe and 81.0% of the control group. LGA ( + 2 SD) was found in 4.8, 10.5 and 3.2%, respectively. Conclusion. Early non-fasting random universal screening and multidisciplinary antenatal teamwork intervention seems to be favourable, with low rates of excessive fetal growth, instrumental vaginal delivery and caesarean section.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available