4.5 Article

In vivo glenohumeral contact forces -: Measurements in the first patient 7 months postoperatively

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 40, Issue 10, Pages 2139-2149

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.10.037

Keywords

shoulder joint; arthroplasty; load; contact forces; measurement; telemetry; in vivo; biomechanics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Knowledge of forces in the glenohumeral joint is essential for understanding normal and pathologic shoulder function. It forms the basis for performing fracture treatment or joint replacement surgery, for optimizing implant design and fixation and for improving and verifying analytical biomechanical models of the shoulder. An instrumented shoulder implant with telemetric data transmission was developed to measure six components of joint contact forces and moments. A patient with humeral head arthrosis achieved good joint function after its implantation.During the first 7 postoperative months, the contact force remained below 100% BW (percent body weight) for most activities of daily living. It ranged up to 130% BW for arm positions close to the limits of motion or when acting against external resistance. When the patient tried to turn a blocked steering wheel with maximum effort, the force rose to about 150% BW, the highest level observed thus far. Of great interest were the force directions relative to the humerus, especially those in the sagittal plane, which were not greatly influenced by the type of exercise, the arm position or the external resistance. The moments due to friction in the joint reached 5.2 N m. The friction-induced shift of contact forces relative to the implant head centre ranged up to 6.3 mm. These first worldwide in vivo measurements of glenohumeral contact forces are being continued in more patients and for longer postoperative times. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available