4.7 Article

Distribution and protected area coverage of endemic taxa in West Africa's Biafran forests and highlands

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages 195-208

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.08.013

Keywords

endemism; Gulf of Guinea; highland areas; protected areas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The forests and highlands along the southern portion of the Nigeria- Cameroon border and on the island of Bioko have long been recognized as being biologically diverse. This region (referred to as the Biaftan forests and highlands) is a center of endemism for a wide variety of taxa including, but not limited to, primates, anuran amphibians, birds, freshwater fish, butterflies, dragonflies, and trees. Though these groups have diverse distributions, conservation efforts have to date largely been focused on lowland areas. We conducted a GIS-based analysis of point locality records for three groups characterized by high endemism (primates, anuran amphibians, birds) in order to examine both their spatial and altitudinal distribution throughout the study area. We also evaluated the distribution of existing and potential protected areas relative to highland areas and the distribution of endemics. our analysis suggests that the existing protected area system provides poor coverage of montane habitats and their associated endemic taxa. Complementarity analysis suggests that, if the protected area network were expanded to include a small number of highland sites, coverage of endemic taxa could be significantly improved. Many of these important highland sites are currently under intense pressure from habitat loss and hunting. if the full range of biodiversity present in the Biafran forests and highlands is to be preserved, new protected areas should be gazetted that take the varied distributions of the regions endemic taxa into account. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available