4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Highly polar bonds and the meaning of covalency and ionicity -: structure and bonding of alkali metal hydride oligomers

Journal

FARADAY DISCUSSIONS
Volume 135, Issue -, Pages 451-468

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b606093e

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The hydrogen-alkali metal bond is simple and archetypal, and thus an ideal model for studying the nature of highly polar element-metal bonds. Thus, we have theoretically explored the alkali metal hydride monomers, HM, and ( distorted) cubic tetramers, (HM)(4), with M = Li, Na, K, and Rb, using density functional theory (DFT) at the BP86/TZ2P level. Our objective is to determine how the structure and thermochemistry ( e. g., H-M bond lengths and strengths, oligomerization energies, etc.) of alkali metal hydrides depend on the metal atom, and to understand the emerging trends in terms of quantitative Kohn-Sham molecular orbital (KS-MO) theory. The H-M bond becomes longer and weaker, both in the monomers and tetramers, if one descends the periodic table from Li to Rb. Quantitative bonding analyses show that this trend is not determined by decreasing electrostatic attraction but, primarily, by the weakening in orbital interactions. The latter become less stabilizing along Li-Rb because the bond overlap between the singly occupied molecular orbitals (SOMOs) of H-. and M-. radicals decreases as the metal ns atomic orbital (AO) becomes larger and more diffuse. Thus, the H - M bond behaves as a text-book electron-pair bond and, in that respect, it is covalent, despite a high polarity. For the lithium and sodium hydride tetramers, the H-4 tetrahedron is larger than and surrounds the M-4 cluster (i.e., H - H 4 M - M). Interestingly, this is no longer the case in the potassium and rubidium hydride tetramers, in which the H4 tetrahedron is smaller than and inside the M4 cluster ( i.e., H-H < M-M).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available