4.5 Article

Investigation of the porcine MUC13 gene: isolation, expression, polymorphisms and strong association with susceptibility to enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F4ab/ac

Journal

ANIMAL GENETICS
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages 258-266

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01721.x

Keywords

ETEC F4ab/ac; MUC13; pig; susceptibility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) F4ab and F4ac are major determinants of piglet diarrhoea. The locus for the ETEC F4ab/ac receptor has been mapped to SSC13q41. MUC13 is a transmembrane mucin expressed predominantly in the epithelial surface of the gastrointestinal tract and the MUC13 gene was assigned to SSC13q41, supporting it as a positional candidate gene for the ETEC F4ab/ac receptor. We herein determined the complete 2679-bp cDNA of pig MUC13, and proved that it was most highly expressed in the jejunum and moderately expressed in the trachea, stomach and liver. Furthermore, 13 MUC13 polymorphisms were identified in 19 founder animals of a White Duroc x Erhualian resource population, and a total of 727 F(2) animals with in vitro ETEC F4ab/ac adhesion phenotypes in this population were genotyped for three identified MUC13 polymorphisms including c.576C > T, c.908A > G and c.935A > C. The transmission disequilibrium test showed that the MUC13 alleles and haplotypes were significantly associated with susceptibility/resistance to ETEC F4ab/ac, especially between haplotype [C;G;A] and susceptibility to ETEC F4ac (P = 8.0e-18). Animals inheriting this haplotype were predominantly susceptible to ETEC F4ac (n = 291/303). Moreover, nearly all animals homozygous for haplotype [T;G;C] (n = 39/41) and a majority of those with the [C;A;A]/[T;G;C] haplotype pair (n = 79/88) were resistant to ETEC F4ab. Our results indicated that MUC13 is in strong linkage disequilibrium with the ETEC F4ab/ac receptor locus and provided potential markers for selection of ETEC F4ab/ac-resistant animals in the pig breeding scheme.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available