4.6 Article

Molecular weight and protein binding affinity of Leucaena condensed tannins and their effects on in vitro fermentation parameters

Journal

ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 159, Issue 3-4, Pages 81-87

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.05.008

Keywords

Condensed tannin; Leucaena; Molecular weight; Methane; Protein binding

Funding

  1. Research University Grant Scheme (RUGS)
  2. Universiti Putra Malaysia [04/01/07/008RU]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objectives of the current study were, firstly to determine the molecular weight of condensed tannins (CTs) of 62-2-8 Leucaena-hybrid Bahru (LLB) and relating it to its protein binding ability, using the local Leucaena leucocephala (LLL) as control and; secondly to evaluate the effect of different levels of CTs of the hybrid LLB on rumen fermentation parameters, including dry matter and nitrogen digestibility and methane gas production. The weight-average molecular weights (M,) of purified CTs extracted from hybrid LLB and local LLL, determined using gel permeation chromatography were near similar, being 2737 and 2872 Da, respectively. However, the CTs of the hybrid LLB exhibited stronger protein binding ability than the local LLL (0.305 and 0.420 mg, respectively, for LLB and LLL to bind half maximum bovine serum albumin). The above results seems to suggest that molecular mass of CTs, at least for Leucaena forages, is not the sole factor in determining their capability to bind protein. Inclusion of about 20-40 mg of CT/g DM of the CTs from hybrid LLB effectively decreased (P<0.05) methane production and in vitro nitrogen digestibility. The above results suggested a potential of using Cfs from the hybrid LLB to protect dietary protein from rumen degradation for better utilization in the small intestine of ruminant animals, and in addition to mitigate their enteric methane emission, often implicated as a source of greenhouse gases. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available