4.7 Article

Low cost sorbents for the removal of methyl parathion pesticide from aqueous solutions

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 66, Issue 10, Pages 1829-1838

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.09.006

Keywords

methyl parathion; agricultural wastes; sorption; water; kinetics; thermodynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sorptive potential of selected agricultural waste materials i.e. rice (Oryza sativa) bran (RB), bagasse fly ash (BFA) of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum), Moringa oleifera pods (MOP) and rice husk (RH) for the removal of methyl parathion pesticide (MP) from surface and ground waters has been investigated. Optimization of operating parameters of sorption process, i.e. sorbent dose, agitation time, pH, initial concentration of sorbate, and temperature have been studied. The sorption data fitted to Freundlich, Langmuir and Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R) sorption isotherms. The maximum capacities of RB, BFA, MOP and RH for MP were calculated to be 3.6 +/- 0.8, 5.3 +/- 1.4, 5.2 +/- 1.5 and 4.7 +/- 1.0 mmol g(-1) by Freundlich, 0.39 +/- 0.009, 0.39 +/- 0.005 , 0.36 +/- 0.004 and 0.35 +/- 0.008 mmol g-1 by Langmuir and 0.9 +/- 0.08, 1.0 +/- 0.10, 1.0 +/- 0.10 and 0.9 +/- 0.07 mmol g(-1) by D-R isotherms respectively, employing 0.1 g of each sorbent, at pH 6, 90 min agitation time and at 303 K. Application of first order Lagergren and Morris-Weber equations to the kinetic data yielded correlation coefficients, close to unity. Thermodynamic parameters of sorption process, i.e. Delta H, Delta S and Delta G were computed and their negative values indicated the exothermic and spontaneous nature of sorption process. The pesticide may be stripped by sonication with methanol, making the regeneration and reutilization of sorbents promising. The sorbents investigated exhibited their potential applications in water decontamination, treatment of industrial and agricultural waste waters. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available