4.5 Article

Experimental evidence for action imitation in killer whales (Orcinus orca)

Journal

ANIMAL COGNITION
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 11-22

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-012-0546-2

Keywords

Social learning; Imitation; 'Do-as-other-does' test; Animal culture; Killer whales

Funding

  1. FPI studentship
  2. Universidad Complutense de Madrid y Comunidad de Madrid [CCG08-UCM/SAL-4007]
  3. Universidad Complutense de Madrid y Banco Santander Central Hispano [UCM- BSCH GR58/08]
  4. AECID (Agencia Espanola de Cooperacion Internacional y Desarrollo), Spain [D/018712/08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Comparative experimental studies of imitative learning have focused mainly on primates and birds. However, cetaceans are promising candidates to display imitative learning as they have evolved in socioecological settings that have selected for large brains, complex sociality, and coordinated predatory tactics. Here we tested imitative learning in killer whales, Orcinus orca. We used a 'do-as-other-does' paradigm in which 3 subjects witnessed a conspecific demonstrator's performance that included 15 familiar and 4 novel behaviours. The three subjects (1) learned the copy command signal 'Do that' very quickly, that is, 20 trials on average; (2) copied 100 % of the demonstrator's familiar and novel actions; (3) achieved full matches in the first attempt for 8-13 familiar behaviours (out of 15) and for the 2 novel behaviours (out of 2) in one subject; and (4) took no longer than 8 trials to accurately copy any familiar behaviour, and no longer than 16 trials to copy any novel behaviour. This study provides experimental evidence for body imitation, including production imitation, in killer whales that is comparable to that observed in dolphins tested under similar conditions. These findings suggest that imitative learning may underpin some of the group-specific traditions reported in killer whales in the field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available