Journal
ANIMAL COGNITION
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages 879-892Publisher
SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-011-0422-5
Keywords
Chimpanzee; Eye-tracking; Fixation duration; Gap-overlap
Categories
Funding
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) [16002001, 19300091, 20002001, 212299]
- JSPS/MEXT global COE [D07, A06]
- Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23220006, 09J02299] Funding Source: KAKEN
Ask authors/readers for more resources
How do humans and their closest relatives, chimpanzees, differ in their fundamental abilities for seeing the visual world? In this study, we directly compared the gaze movements of humans and the closest species, chimpanzees, using an eye-tracking system. During free viewing of a naturalistic scene, chimpanzees made more fixations per second (up to four) than did humans (up to three). This species difference was independent of the semantic variability of the presented scenes. The gap-overlap paradigm revealed that, rather than resulting from the sensitivity to the peripherally presented stimuli per se, the species difference reflected the particular strategy each species employed to solve the rivalry between central (fixated) and peripheral stimuli in their visual fields. Finally, when presented with a movie in which small images successively appeared/disappeared at random positions at the chosen presentation rate, chimpanzees tracked those images at the point of fixation for a longer time than did humans, outperforming humans in their speed of scanning. Our results suggest that chimpanzees and humans differ quantitatively in their visual strategies involving the timing of gaze movement. We discuss the functional reasons for each species' employing such specific strategies.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available