4.7 Review

Lung cancer risk prediction: A tool for early detection

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 120, Issue 1, Pages 1-6

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.22331

Keywords

lung neoplasm; risk prediction; high-risk; early detection; biomarker

Categories

Funding

  1. MRC [G9900432] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G9900432] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G9900432] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although 45% of men and 39% of women will be diagnosed with cancer in their lifetime, it is difficult to predict which individuals will be affected. For some cancers, substantial progress in individual risk estimation has already been made. However, relatively few models have been developed to predict lung cancer risk beyond effects of age and smoking. This paper reviews published models for lung cancer risk prediction, discusses their potential contribution to clinical and research settings and suggests improvements to the risk modeling strategy for lung cancer. The sensitivity and specificity of existing cancer risk models is less than optimal. Improvement in individual risk prediction is important for selection of individuals for prevention or early detection interventions. In addition to smoking, factors related to occupational exposure, personal medical history and family history of cancer can add to the predictive power. A good risk prediction model is one that can identify a small fraction of the population in which a large proportion of the disease cases will occur. In the future, genetic and other biological markers are likely to be useful, although they will require rigorous evaluation. Validation is essential to establish the predictive effect and for ongoing monitoring of the model's continued relevance. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available