4.5 Article

Pigeons can discriminate good and bad paintings by children

Journal

ANIMAL COGNITION
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 75-85

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-009-0246-8

Keywords

Concept; Category; Visual discrimination; Aesthetics; Visual art

Funding

  1. Global COE (Center of excellence) in Japan [D029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Humans have the unique ability to create art, but non-human animals may be able to discriminate good art from bad art. In this study, I investigated whether pigeons could be trained to discriminate between paintings that had been judged by humans as either bad or good. To do this, adult human observers first classified several children's paintings as either good (beautiful) or bad (ugly). Using operant conditioning procedures, pigeons were then reinforced for pecking at good paintings. After the pigeons learned the discrimination task, they were presented with novel pictures of both good and bad children's paintings to test whether they had successfully learned to discriminate between these two stimulus categories. The results showed that pigeons could discriminate novel good and bad paintings. Then, to determine which cues the subjects used for the discrimination, I conducted tests of the stimuli when the paintings were of reduced size or grayscale. In addition, I tested their ability to discriminate when the painting stimuli were mosaic and partial occluded. The pigeons maintained discrimination performance when the paintings were reduced in size. However, discrimination performance decreased when stimuli were presented as grayscale images or when a mosaic effect was applied to the original stimuli in order to disrupt spatial frequency. Thus, the pigeons used both color and pattern cues for their discrimination. The partial occlusion did not disrupt the discriminative behavior suggesting that the pigeons did not attend to particular parts, namely upper, lower, left or right half, of the paintings. These results suggest that the pigeons are capable of learning the concept of a stimulus class that humans name good pictures. The second experiment showed that pigeons learned to discriminate watercolor paintings from pastel paintings. The subjects showed generalization to novel paintings. Then, as the first experiment, size reduction test, grayscale test, mosaic processing test and partial occlusion test were carried out. The results suggest that the pigeons used both color and pattern cues for the discrimination and show that non-human animals, such as pigeons, can be trained to discriminate abstract visual stimuli, such as pictures and may also have the ability to learn the concept of beauty as defined by humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available