4.5 Article

Short-term observational spatial memory in Jackdaws (Corvus monedula) and Ravens (Corvus corax)

Journal

ANIMAL COGNITION
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 691-698

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-008-0160-5

Keywords

corvid; observational spatial memory; Raven; Jackdaw

Funding

  1. European Community's Sixth Framework Program [NEST 012929]
  2. Austrian Science Fund [R31-B03, P16939-B03]
  3. 'Cumberland Stiftung'
  4. 'Verein der Forderer'
  5. French Ministry of Research
  6. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P16939] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  7. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [Y 366] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observational spatial memory (OSM) refers to the ability of remembering food caches made by other individuals, enabling observers to find and pilfer the others' caches. Within birds, OSM has only been demonstrated in corvids, with more social species such as Mexican jays (Aphelocoma ultramarine) showing a higher accuracy of finding conspecific' caches than less social species such as Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). However, socially dynamic corvids such as ravens (Corvus corax) are capable of sophisticated pilfering manoeuvres based on OSM. We here compared the performance of ravens and jackdaws (Corvus monedula) in a short-term OSM task. In contrast to ravens, jackdaws are socially cohesive but hardly cache and compete over food caches. Birds had to recover food pieces after watching a human experimenter hiding them in 2, 4 or 6 out of 10 possible locations. Results showed that for tests with two, four and six caches, ravens performed more accurately than expected by chance whereas jackdaws did not. Moreover, ravens made fewer re-visits to already inspected cache sites than jackdaws. These findings suggest that the development of observational spatial memory skills is linked with the species' reliance on food caches rather than with a social life style per se.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available