4.5 Article

Mechanoelectrical feedback regulates the arrhythmogenic activity of pulmonary veins

Journal

HEART
Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages 82-88

Publisher

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2006.089359

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Atrial fibrillation is commonly associated with dilated pulmonary veins. Stretch has been shown to have mechano-electrical effects. Objective: To investigate whether stretch can increase the arrhythmogenic activity of the pulmonary veins. Methods: The transmembrane action potentials were recorded from rabbit pulmonary veins before and after stretch ( 100 and 300 mg). Gadolinium and streptomycin ( stretch-activated ion channel blockers) were each perfused into the pulmonary veins under a 300-mg stretch. Results: Stretch ( 0, 100 and 300 mg) force dependently increased the incidence of spontaneous activity ( 22%, 48% and 83%; p < 0.05), mean ( standard deviation ( SD)) firing rates of spontaneous activity ( 1.7 ( 0.2), 2.1 ( 0.3) and 3 ( 0.2) Hz; p < 0.05) and incidence of early post-depolarisations ( 9%, 26% and 61%; p < 0.05) and delayed post-depolarisations ( 0%, 4% and 30%; p < 0.05) in 23 pulmonary veins. In the seven preparations with spontaneous activity after the 300-mg stretch, gadolinium ( 1, 3 and 10 mu mol/l) decreased the incidence of spontaneous activity by 43%, 29% and 14%, respectively ( p < 0.05), and decreased the firing rate from 2.9 ( 0.1) Hz to 0.8 ( 0.4), 0.3 ( 0.1) and 0.1 ( 0.1) Hz, respectively ( p < 0.05). Streptomycin ( 10 and 40 mu mol/l) decreased the incidence of spontaneous activity by 71% and 29%, respectively ( p < 0.05), and decreased the firing rate from 2.9 ( 0.1) Hz to 1.6 ( 0.4) and 0.5 ( 0.3) Hz, respectively ( p < 0.05). Conclusion: Stretch is an important factor in the electrical activity of the pulmonary vein. Stretch-induced arrhythmogenic activity of the pulmonary vein may contribute to the genesis of atrial fibrillation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available