4.5 Article

Memory, transmission and persistence of alternative foraging techniques in wild common marmosets

Journal

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
Volume 91, Issue -, Pages 79-91

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.02.023

Keywords

common marmoset; field experiment; memory; persistence; social learning; tradition

Funding

  1. FWF (Austrian Science Fund) [Y366-B17]
  2. KWA fellowship of the University of Vienna
  3. KWA fellowship of IPS research grant
  4. Lise Meitner fellowship of the FWF [M 1351-B17]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experimental studies on traditions in animals have focused almost entirely on the initial transmission phase in captive populations. We conducted an open diffusion field experiment with 13 groups of wild common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus. Seven groups contained individuals that were already familiar with the task ('push or pull' box) and thus served as potential models for naive individuals. Additionally, in four groups one individual was trained for one of the two possible techniques and in two control groups no skilled individuals were present. First, we investigated whether experienced individuals would remember how to solve the task even after 2 years without exposure and whether they would still prefer their learned technique. Second, we tested whether naive individuals would learn socially from their skilled family members and, more importantly, whether they would use the same technique. Third, we conducted several test blocks to see whether the individual and/or group behaviour would persist over time. Our results show that wild common marmosets were able to memorize, learn socially and maintain preferences of foraging techniques. This field experiment thus reveals a promising approach to studying social learning in the wild and provides the basis for long-term studies on tradition formation. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published on behalf of The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available