4.5 Article

Rank effects on social stress in lactating chimpanzees

Journal

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
Volume 87, Issue -, Pages 195-202

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.10.031

Keywords

chimpanzee; Gombe National Park; lactation; Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii; rank status; stress

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [LTREB-1052693]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 AI058715, 5R00HD057992]
  3. Duke University
  4. Davee Center for Epidemiology and Endocrinology (Lincoln Park Zoo, Chicago, IL, U.S.A.)
  5. Leo S. Guthman Foundation
  6. NSFGRF
  7. Leakey Foundation
  8. Wenner-Gren Foundation
  9. Field Museum African Council
  10. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R00HD057992] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  11. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI058715] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Given the deleterious consequences associated with chronic stress, individual differences in stress susceptibility can have important fitness implications. These differences may be explained in part by dominance status because high rank is typically associated with decreased aggression and improved nutrition. Here, we examined the relationship between dominance and social stress in lactating chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii, at Gombe National Park, Tanzania. We did so by pairing daily demographic and behavioural data with faecal glucocorticoid metabolite (FGM) concentrations collected over 37 months. While there was no main effect of rank, interesting differences emerged by adult subgroup size and adult sex ratio (males/females). We found that differences in FGM concentrations between high-and low-ranking females were most pronounced as adult subgroup size and sex ratio increased. Low-ranking females had higher FGM concentrations in larger subgroups and in subgroups biased towards adult males; we observed no comparable change in FGM concentrations amongst highranking females. Because low-ranking females were the recipient of significantly more male aggression relative to females of high rank, these patterns may be driven by psychosocial stress in low-ranking females. There was no significant change in diet quality across subgroup sizes; this finding suggests that nutritional stressors were not driving differences in female FGM concentrations. Being susceptible to social stress has important fitness implications as it may constrain low-ranking females from `choosing' optimal subgroups to take advantage of food resources and/or for the socialization of their offspring. (C) 2013 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available