4.5 Article

Comprehensive epitope analysis of cross-clade Gag-specific T-cell responses in individuals with early HIV-1 infection in the US epidemic

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 381-390

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.07.045

Keywords

cross-clade; T-cell reactivity; primary HIV-1

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI27757, AI57005, AI64061] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To elucidate the mechanisms underlying cross-clade T-cell reactivity, we evaluated responses to Gag peptides based on clades A, B, C, and M-group sequences at the epitope level by IFN-gamma ELISpot assay in 25 subjects following primary clade B infection. T-cell reactivity to CON (consensus), COT (center of tree), and ANC (most recent common ancestor) B peptides was similar and a high level of cross-reactivity was noted to clade A. C, and M-group peptides. T-cell responses to 15 of the 16 epitopes reacted with at least 1 of the 2 heterologous peptides (A or C or both) and 7 epitopes were invariant across all 3 clades. The remaining 9 epitopes were associated with a total of I I variant sequences, and with the exception of 1. all substitutions were outside the HLA anchor positions. We conclude that Gag-specific cross-clade T-cell responses producing IFN-gamma can be detected in primary HIV-gamma infection. Cross-reactivity is attributable to the recognized epitopes being either invariant across clades or differing by single amino acid substitutions outside the HLA anchor sites. Semi-conservative and non-conservative substitutions that presumably involve the T-cell receptor contact sites have significant effects on T-cell recognition. Finally, further studies are needed to determine if the detection of cross-clade IFN-gamma T-cell responses indeed translates to cross-reactive antiviral activity. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available