4.2 Article

Qualitative and quantitative differences between taste buds of the rat and mouse

Journal

BMC NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-8-5

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [DC00285, R01 DC000285, F32 DC000285, DC004657, P30 DC004657] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Numerous electrophysiological, ultrastructural, and immunocytochemical studies on rodent taste buds have been carried out on rat taste buds. In recent years, however, the mouse has become the species of choice for molecular and other studies on sensory transduction in taste buds. Do rat and mouse taste buds have the same cell types, sensory transduction markers and synaptic proteins? In the present study we have used antisera directed against PLC beta 2, alpha-gustducin, serotonin (5-HT), PGP 9.5 and synaptobrevin-2 to determine the percentages of taste cells expressing these markers in taste buds in both rodent species. We also determined the numbers of taste cells in the taste buds as well as taste bud volume. Results: There are significant differences (p < 0.05) between mouse and rat taste buds in the percentages of taste cells displaying immunoreactivity for all five markers. Rat taste buds display significantly more immunoreactivity than mice for PLC beta 2 (31.8% vs 19.6%), alpha-gustducin (18% vs 14.6%), and synaptobrevin-2 (31.2% vs 26.3%). Mice, however, have more cells that display immunoreactivity to 5-HT (15.9% vs 13.7%) and PGP 9.5 (14.3% vs 9.4%). Mouse taste buds contain an average of 85.8 taste cells vs 68.4 taste cells in rat taste buds. The average volume of a mouse taste bud (42,000 mu m(3)) is smaller than a rat taste bud (64,200 mu m(3)). The numerical density of taste cells in mouse circumvallate taste buds (2.1 cells/1000 mu m(3)) is significantly higher than that in the rat (1.2 cells/1000 mu m(3)). Conclusion: These results suggest that rats and mice differ significantly in the percentages of taste cells expressing signaling molecules. We speculate that these observed dissimilarities may reflect differences in their gustatory processing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available