4.7 Article

Comparison of proanthocyanidins in commercial antioxidants: Grape seed and pine bark extracts

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages 148-156

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf063150n

Keywords

grape seed extract; pine bark extract; proanthocyanidin; catechin; epicatechin; HPLC; LC/MS; GC/MS; GPC; MALDI-TOF MS

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [N01-ES-05457] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The major constituents in grape seed and pine bark extracts are proanthocyanidins. To evaluate material available to consumers, select lots were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS), gel permeation chromatography (GPC), and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) LC/MS was used to identify monomers, dimers, and trimers present. GC/MS analyses led to the identification of ethyl esters of hexadecanoic acid, linoleic acid, and oleic acid, as well as smaller phenolic and terpene components. The GPC molecular weight (MW) distribution indicated components ranging from similar to 162 to similar to 5500 MW (pine bark less than 1180 MW and grape seed similar to 1180 to similar to 5000 MW). MALDI-TOF MS analyses showed that pine bark did not contain oligomers with odd numbers of gallate units and grape seed contained oligomers with both odd and even numbers of gallate. Reflectron MALDI-TOF MS identified oligomers up to a pentamer and heptamer, and linear MALDI-TOF MS showed a mass range nearly double that of reflectron analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available