4.7 Article

Ni(II) biosorption by Cassia fistula (Golden Shower) biomass

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 139, Issue 2, Pages 345-355

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.040

Keywords

sorption; Ni(II); equilibrium; kinetics; Cassia fistula

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cassia fistula is a fast-growing, medium-sized, deciduous tree which is now widely cultivated worldwide as an ornamental tree for its beautiful showy yellow flowers. Methods are required to reuse fallen leaves, branches, stem bark and pods when they start getting all over lawn. This investigation studies the use of these non-useful parts of C fistula as naturally occurring biosorbent for the batch removal of Ni(II) in a well stirred system under different experimental conditions. The data showed that the maximum pH (pH(max)) for efficient sorption of Ni(II) was 6 at which evaluated biosorbent dosage, biosorbent particle size, initial concentrations of Ni(II) and sorption time were 0.1 g/100 mL, < 0.255 mm, up to 200 mg/L and 720 min, respectively. The experimental results were analyzed in terms of Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms. The Langnmir isotherm model fitted well to data of Ni(II) biosorption by C. fistula biomass as compared to the model of Freundlich. The kinetic studies showed that the sorption rates could be described better by a second order expression than by a more commonly applied Lagergren equation. The magnitude of the Gibbs free energy values indicates spontaneous nature of the sorption process. The sorption ability of C. fistula biomass for Ni(II) removal tends to be in the order: leaves < stem bark < pods bark. One hundred percent Ni(II) removal was achieved when the initial Ni(II) concentration was 25 mg/L. Due to its outstanding Ni(II) uptake capacity, C. fistula biomass proved to be an excellent biomaterial for accumulating Ni(II) from aqueous solutions. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available